Efficiency of the application of bio preparations in the intensive apple orchard of Kharkiv Fruit Company LLC
DOI: 10.35205/0558-1125-2023-78-111-120
UDC 631.8:634.11.076
EFFICIENCY OF THE APPLICATION OF BIO PREPARATIONS IN THE INTENSIVE APPLE ORCHARD OF KHARKIV FRUIT COMPANY LLC
V. LEUS, PhD, Docent
National biotechnological University, 61002, Kharkiv, 44, Alchevsk Str., e-mail: Leus@ukr.net
L. SHUBENKO, S. KUBRAK, PhDs, Docents
Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, 09117, Bila Tserkva, 8/1, Soborna Sq., e-mail: Shubenko.l@ukr.net
The use of biostimulating microfertilizers during foliar feeding makes it possible to reduce the introduction of mineral fertilizers into the soil. This method of fertilization is safe for the environment because the nutrients are applied in controlled amounts. The purpose of our research was to evaluate the effect of foliar fertilization of apple trees on productivity, commercial quality of fruits and economic efficiency. As a result of the research, a positive effect of the use of biostimulants in intensive apple plantations of Gala, Pinova, Fuji, Red Jonaprinz varieties was established. In the course of research, biological preparations of the company "Timak Agro Ukraine" of the brands Maxifruit, Fertileader Elite, Fertileader Axis were used. Application of these drugs was carried out according to the scheme: when the average size of the fruits was 30 mm, foliar treatment with biostimulants at the rate of 3 l/ha was carried out, followed by repetition after 10 days.
To assess the effect of the biological preparation, apples were sorted into fractions according to the diameter of the fruit - less than 60 mm, 60-69 mm, 70-75 mm, more than 75 mm. They also calculated the yield and evaluated the marketable quality of the harvested fruits.
It has been proven that foliar treatment of trees with biological preparations helps to increase the size of fruits, which in turn reduces the number of non-standard products (fruits with a diameter of less than 60 mm) and significantly increases the share of fruits larger than 70 mm. Due to their anti-stress properties, biological preparations had the maximum effect on the fruits of the Pinova variety, which is not sufficiently resistant to high temperatures and low air humidity, increasing the share of fruits larger than 70 mm by 21.4 % compared to the control and the small-fruited Gala variety, for which this increase was equal to 12.9 %.
It was established that as a result of increasing yield, improving the size, and therefore the marketability of fruits, the average sale price increased, which in turn increased the economic efficiency of fruit cultivation.
Key words: apple tree, variety, foliar fertilization, product quality, yield, economic efficiency.
Список використаної літератури
1.Воєводін В.В. Проблеми створення інтенсивних садів у різних зонах України. Новини садівництва. 1997. № 1-4. С. 2-3.
2.Гриник І. Шляхи успішного розвитку садівництва. Аграрний тиждень. 2012. № 26. С.14-15.
3.Єрмаков О.Ю. Сучасний стан і перспективи розвитку промислового садівництва в Україні. Садівництво. 1999. Вип. 49. С. 194-204.
4.Костюк Л.А. Економічна оцінка нових та перспективних сортів яблуні вітчизняної селекції у насадженнях різних конструкцій. Економічні науки. 2013. Т.2, № 21. С. 132-140.
5.Вінцковська Ю.Ю. Вплив позакореневої обробки насаджень яблуні (Malus domestica Borkh.) біопрепаратами на формування показників якості плодів. Вісник Полтавської державної аграрної академії. 2016. Вип. 1-2. С. 107-112. DOI: 10.31210/visnyk2016.1-2.21.
6.Самойленко О. Інтенсивний сад в умовах України. Пропозиція. 2013. № 2. С.50-55
7.Impact of foliar fertilization on apple and pear trees in reconciling productivity and alleviation of environmental concerns under arid conditions / Zargar M. et al. Commun Integr Biol. 2019. №12(1). Р. 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/19420889.2019.1565252.
8.El-Boray M.S., Mostafa M.F.M., Salem S.E., El-Sawwah O.A.O. Improving yield and fruit quality of Washington Navel orange using foliar bapplications of some natural biostimulants. J. Plant Prod. Masoura Univ. 2015. № 6. Р. 1317–1332
9.The use of biostimulants in high-density olive growing: Quality and production / Hernández-Hernandez G., Salazar D.M., Martínez-Tomé J., López-Corté I. Asian J. Adv. Agric. Res. 2019. № 10. Р. 1–11.
10.Tanou G., Ziogas V., Molassiotis A. Foliar Nutrition, Biostimulants and Prime-Like Dynamics in Fruit Tree Physiology: New Insights on an Old Topic. Front Plant Sci. 2017. № 8. Р.75. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00075.
11.Murtic Senad. Foliar nutrition in apple production. African journal of biotechnology. 2012. Vol. 11. DOI: 10.5897/AJB12.477.
12.Biostimulant based on protein hydrolysates promotes the growth of young olive trees / Almadi L. et al. Agriculture. 2020. Vol. 10(12). Р. 618. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10120618.
13.Influence of plant biostimulant as technique to harden citrus nursery plants before transplanting to the field / Conesa M.R., Espinosa P.J., Pallarés D., Pérez-Pastor A. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. Р. 6190. DOI: 10.3390/su12156190.
14.Foliar application of calcium and growth regulators modulate sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) tree performance / Correia S. et al. Plants. 2020. №9. Р. 410. DOI: 10.3390/plants9040410.
15.15 Ben Mimoun M., Marchand M. Effects of potassium foliar fertilization on different fruit tree crops over five years of experiments. Acta Hortic. 2013. Vol. 984. P. 211-217. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.984.23.
16.Experience with foliar nutrition in apple orchard / Stampar F. et al. Acta Hortic. 2002. Vol. 594. Р. 547-552. DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.594.72.
17.Василенко М. Органо-мінеральні добрива і регулятори росту рослин в органічному землеробстві. Вісник аграрної науки. 2017. Вип. 95(2). С. 11-18. DOI: 10.31073/agrovisnyk201702-02.
18.Influence of foliar micronutrients fertilization on nutritional status of apple trees / Kurešová G. et al. Plant Soil Environ. 2019. Vol. 65(6). Р. 320-327. DOI: 10.17221/196/2019-PSE.
19.Application of homemade organic fertilizer for improving quality of apple fruit, soil physicochemical characteristics, and microbial diversity / Wang X., Bao Q., Sun G., Li J. Agronomy. 2022. Vol. 12(9). Р. 2055. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12092055.
20.Nutrient content with different fertilizer management and influence on yield and fruit quality in apple cv. Gala / Mota M. et al. Horticulture. 2022. Vol. 8(8). Р.713. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8080713.
21.Biological protection of apple-tree from apple-blossom weevil (Anthonomus pomorum Linnaeus, 1758) / Zabrodina I., Stankevych S., Sirous L., Leus V. Modern trends in the development of agricultural production: problems and perspectives: monograph / edited by S. Stankevych, O. Mandych. Tallinn: Teadmus OÜ, 2022. P. 83-96.
22.Apricot tree nutrient uptake, fruit quality and phytochemical attributes, and soil fertility under organic and integrated management / Roussos P.A. et al. Appl. Sci. 2023. Vol. 13. Р. 2596. DOI: 10.3390/app13042596.
23.Леус В.В. Продуктивність інтродукованих сортів яблуні в умовах Лівобережного Лісостепу України. Інноваційні технології в агрономії, землеустрої, електроенергетиці, лісовому та садово-парковому господарстві : матеріали міжнародної науково-практичної конференції, 20.10.2022. Білоцерківський НАУ, 2022. С. 73-75.
24.Кондратенко П.В., Бублик М.О. Методика проведення польових досліджень з плодовими культурами. Київ: Аграрна наука, 1996. 95 с.